Larry Sanger built Wikipedia as an unbiased repository of the world’s knowledge, and then stood helplessly by as activists and intel agencies turned it into the most comprehensive propaganda op in human history.
I recently did an article about AI and Wikipedia, this long video by Tucker Carlson outlines the details. Looks like this is video week at teddyearp's soapbox, hehe. So for kicks, there is an article which seems to do a different analysis but comes basically to the same conclusion. Wikipedia is left wing biased, heavily. And I personally have seen it go more and more that way in the last decade.
Larry Sanger built Wikipedia as an unbiased repository of the world’s knowledge, and then stood helplessly by as activists and intel agencies turned it into the most comprehensive propaganda op in human history. There’s nothing more corrupt.
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) September 29, 2025
(0:00) The Origins of Wikipedia… pic.twitter.com/J59oEejCG2
- We find a mild to moderate tendency in Wikipedia articles to associate public figures ideologically aligned right-of-center with more negative sentiment than public figures ideologically aligned left-of-center.
- We also find prevailing associations of negative emotions (e.g., anger and disgust) with right-leaning public figures; and positive emotions (e.g., joy) with left-leaning public figures.
- These trends constitute suggestive evidence of political bias embedded in Wikipedia articles.
